Can I Get a Protection Order for Cyber Harassment?

Yes. In Washington, harassment and stalking that happen online can support a civil protection order, and the conduct does not have to be face to face to count. For a focused explanation, read what Is Harassment Under Washington Law.

The Short Answer

If someone is targeting you through texts, emails, social media, fake accounts, or repeated unwanted messages, Washington law gives you a way to ask a court to make it stop. Online conduct can be the basis for an antiharassment protection order or a stalking protection order under the state's civil protection order law, chapter 7.105 RCW. What matters is the pattern and effect of the behavior, not the medium it travels through. A person who never shows up at your door can still be ordered to leave you alone.

Courts in Snohomish County handle these petitions regularly, and you do not need to have a criminal case open, a police report on file, or a lawyer standing next to you to file one. You do need to be able to describe what happened and show why it qualifies.

How Washington Defines the Conduct

The definitions that drive these cases live in RCW 7.105.010, and they are written broadly enough to reach modern behavior. The statute defines "unlawful harassment" as a knowing and willful course of conduct directed at a specific person that seriously alarms, annoys, harasses, or is detrimental to that person and that serves no legitimate or lawful purpose. The conduct has to be the kind that would cause a reasonable person to suffer substantial emotional distress, and it has to actually cause you that distress. A "course of conduct" is defined in the same statute as a pattern of acts over a period of time, however short, and the law specifically says that pattern "includes any form of communication, contact, or conduct, including the sending of an electronic communication." That single sentence is why online messages, DMs, and repeated emails can support a petition.

Stalking is defined in the same section. Under RCW 7.105.010, stalking includes a course of conduct involving repeated or continuing contacts, attempts to contact, monitoring, tracking, surveillance, keeping a person under observation, disrupting activities in a harassing manner, or following someone, where that conduct would cause a reasonable person to feel intimidated, frightened, under duress, or threatened, actually causes that feeling, and serves no lawful purpose. Monitoring and surveillance are listed by name, which is important because a great deal of cyber harassment is exactly that: tracking your movements, watching your accounts, and reminding you that you are being watched.

The statute also recognizes "coercive control," and its examples include using technology to threaten, humiliate, harass, stalk, or intimidate another person, including through cyberstalking, monitoring, surveillance, impersonation, manipulation of electronic media, and the distribution of or threats to distribute intimate images. If your situation involves a current or former intimate partner or a family or household member, this language matters, because that conduct can support a domestic violence protection order under the same chapter.

There is one important limit built into the law. The definition of "course of conduct" in RCW 7.105.010 excludes constitutionally protected free speech. Someone criticizing you publicly, even harshly, is not automatically committing unlawful harassment. The line is drawn at conduct that serves no legitimate purpose and is aimed at alarming, harassing, or distressing you.

Which Protection Order Fits Online Harassment?
Three civil orders reach digital conduct (Ch. 7.105 RCW).
Antiharassment
Anyone at all
A neighbor, coworker, ex, or stranger online. A knowing pattern that seriously alarms you and serves no lawful purpose.
Stalking
Repeated contact or surveillance
Monitoring, tracking, watching your accounts, or contact that would frighten a reasonable person.
Domestic violence
Partner or family member
Includes coercive control by technology: cyberstalking, impersonation, or threats to distribute intimate images.
You do not have to pick perfectly: a petition cannot be dismissed just because the facts fit a different order type (RCW 7.105.100). A temporary order can issue the day you file.

Which Order Fits Your Situation

Washington offers several types of protection orders, and RCW 7.105.100 lists them. An antiharassment protection order fits a course of unlawful harassment by almost anyone, including a neighbor, a coworker, an ex, or a stranger online. A stalking protection order fits repeated contact, monitoring, or surveillance. A domestic violence protection order fits when the person harassing you is an intimate partner or a family or household member. You do not have to pick perfectly. The same statute provides that a petition cannot be dismissed just because the facts would also fit a different type of order, so filing under a reasonable theory will not sink your case on a technicality.

A note on the criminal side. Washington has separate criminal statutes that can apply to online conduct, and those laws have changed over the years. A civil protection order under chapter 7.105 RCW is a different track from a criminal charge, and you can pursue the civil order on your own without waiting for a prosecutor. Because the criminal cyber statutes have been amended, it is worth having someone confirm the current criminal exposure separately if that is part of your concern. For the protection order itself, the civil definitions above are what the court applies.

What Helps Your Petition

The court is going to look for a pattern and for evidence that the conduct is aimed at you and serves no legitimate purpose. Screenshots of messages with dates and times, the sender's account or number, records of blocked accounts that reappear under new names, and a plain timeline of what happened and when all help the judge see the course of conduct the statute describes. If the contact made you afraid or unable to go about your day, say so clearly, because both the harassment and stalking definitions turn on the effect the conduct has on you.

You can request a temporary protection order when you file, which the court can grant quickly and without advance notice to the other person, followed by a full hearing where both sides appear. RCW 7.105.100 allows that two step process.

Getting Help in Snohomish County

Online harassment is often relentless in a way that is hard to convey until you live it, and the law recognizes that repeated digital contact can be every bit as alarming as showing up in person. If someone is harassing, tracking, or threatening you through your phone or your accounts, you have a real path to a court order. If you would like help understanding which type of protection order fits your situation or how to present your evidence, the Law Office of Chad Foster works with people across Snohomish County and can walk you through your options.

If you are in immediate danger, call 911.

Need help with a protection order or safety matter in King or Snohomish County? Learn about our protection order services, or call 425.785.8679 for a consultation.