What Is Domestic Violence Under Washington Law?

Many people picture domestic violence only as a physical attack, but Washington law defines it far more broadly, and understanding that definition is the first step toward protecting yourself or someone you love. If you are trying to decide whether what you are experiencing in Snohomish County qualifies, the legal definition matters more than the label anyone else puts on it. The Law Office of Chad Foster helps Snohomish County clients with protection-order representation.

What Is Domestic Violence Under Washington Law: At a Glance
Three practical points explained in this guide.
Key point 1
The Legal Definition Is Broader Than You Might Expect
For the purpose of protection orders, Washington defines domestic violence in RCW 7.105.010. Under that definition, domestic violence includes physical harm, bodily injury, assault, or the infliction of fear of physical harm, bodily injury, or assault.
Key point 2
Coercive Control: Abuse Without a Bruise
Coercive control is one of the most important developments in Washington's protection order law, so it is worth understanding what it captures. The statute describes it as a pattern of behavior used to cause another person physical, emotional, or psychological harm that unreasonably interferes with that person's free will and personal liberty.
Key point 3
Whose Conduct Counts: Relationship Categories
Domestic violence, as a legal category, is defined not only by what happened but by the relationship between the people involved. The same statute splits the covered relationships into two groups, and understanding which group applies helps you understand what kind of protection order fits your situation.
Use these checkpoints as an overview, then read the sections below for details that may apply to your situation.

The Legal Definition Is Broader Than You Might Expect

For the purpose of protection orders, Washington defines domestic violence in RCW 7.105.010. Under that definition, domestic violence includes physical harm, bodily injury, assault, or the infliction of fear of physical harm, bodily injury, or assault. So far this matches what most people expect. But the definition goes considerably further. It also includes nonconsensual sexual conduct or nonconsensual sexual penetration, coercive control, unlawful harassment, and stalking.

Two of those categories deserve emphasis because they surprise people. First, the mere infliction of fear counts. You do not have to be struck for the conduct to qualify. Threatening behavior that puts you in genuine fear of physical harm can meet the definition on its own. Second, the law recognizes coercive control, which reaches patterns of behavior that dominate and isolate a person even without physical violence. This is a meaningful expansion, because many people living with controlling or threatening partners never experience a single blow yet are unquestionably in an abusive situation. For related guidance, see Domestic Violence Leave Expands.

Coercive Control: Abuse Without a Bruise

Coercive control is one of the most important developments in Washington's protection order law, so it is worth understanding what it captures. The statute describes it as a pattern of behavior used to cause another person physical, emotional, or psychological harm that unreasonably interferes with that person's free will and personal liberty. The examples the law gives paint a clear picture: destroying or threatening to destroy property, using technology to monitor, stalk, or humiliate someone, controlling a person's identity documents or finances, isolating them from friends and family, threatening to harm children, pets, or careers, and threatening to expose private information. For related guidance, see Can I Get a Protection Order Against a Family Member.

The law is careful to exclude protective actions a person takes in good faith to protect themselves or their children. But for someone who feels trapped by a partner's control rather than by physical force, the recognition of coercive control means the courthouse door is open to them too. This matters enormously for people who have long believed their situation "did not count" because it was not physically violent.

Whose Conduct Counts: Relationship Categories

Domestic violence, as a legal category, is defined not only by what happened but by the relationship between the people involved. The same statute splits the covered relationships into two groups, and understanding which group applies helps you understand what kind of protection order fits your situation.

The first group is intimate partners. Under RCW 7.105.010, intimate partners include spouses and domestic partners, former spouses and former domestic partners, people who have a child in common regardless of whether they were ever married or lived together, and people who have or have had a dating relationship where both are at least 13 years old. In everyday terms, this covers current and former spouses, current and former dating partners, and co-parents.

The second group is family or household members. The statute defines these as people related by blood, marriage, domestic partnership, or adoption; people who currently live together or formerly lived together; people who have a parent-child relationship, including stepparents and stepchildren, grandparents and grandchildren, and a parent's intimate partner and children; and a person who is acting or has acted as a legal guardian. This reaches relatives, roommates, and extended family situations that would not fit the intimate partner category.

The distinction is not just academic. Washington's protection order system treats domestic violence between intimate partners somewhat differently from conflict among other family or household members, and knowing where your relationship falls helps you and your attorney identify the right path forward.

How the Definition Connects to Protection Orders

This definition lives inside chapter 7.105 RCW, which is Washington's unified civil protection order law. When someone petitions for a domestic violence protection order, the court measures the alleged conduct against exactly the definition described above. If the conduct fits, and the relationship fits one of the covered categories, the court can issue an order that, among other things, directs the other person to stay away, prohibits contact, and addresses issues like temporary use of a home. Because this is a civil process, the person seeking protection does not need a criminal case to be filed or a conviction to be obtained. The two systems run on separate tracks, and a protection order can be pursued on its own.

For families in Snohomish County, this often intersects with family law. A domestic violence finding can influence parenting arrangements, decisions about who remains in the family home, and the overall trajectory of a divorce or custody case. That overlap is one reason it helps to work with someone who understands both the protection order process and the family law consequences that can flow from it.

You Do Not Have to Sort This Out Alone

If you recognize your situation in any part of this definition, whether it is physical harm, threats that leave you afraid, or a pattern of control that has narrowed your world, Washington law may offer you protection. Understanding the definition is the beginning, not the end, and the specifics of your relationship and circumstances shape what options make sense. The Law Office of Chad Foster helps people in Snohomish County understand their rights and pursue the protection and stability they need. If you have questions about your situation, reach out to talk them through in confidence.

If you are in immediate danger, call 911.

Need help with a protection order or safety matter in King or Snohomish County? Learn about our protection order services, or call 425.785.8679 for a consultation.